Write your message
Volume 9, Issue 1 (February 2022)                   IJML 2022, 9(1): 1-5 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farokhnia M, Hosseininasab A, Kamali M, Pourabbas B, Taheri Sarvtin M. A Study on Bacterial Agents of Patients with Meningitis Referred to Afzalipour Hospital in Kerman, South East Iran. IJML 2022; 9 (1) :1-5
URL: http://ijml.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-422-en.html
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Keywords: Bacteria, Kerman, Meningitis
Full-Text [PDF 80 kb]   (400 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (812 Views)
Full-Text:   (376 Views)
Introduction
Meningitis is an infection and swelling of the meninges that requires early diagnosis and treatment. Although most cases of meningitis improve, it can cause serious complications such as brain damage and deafness, and even death if left untreated [1]. Most meningitis has common symptoms such as fever, seizures, nausea, vomiting, headache, stiff neck, sensitivity to light, irritability, chills, and lethargy [1, 2]. Various microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites can play a role in causing meningitis [3]. Bacterial meningitis is very important due to its high morbidity and mortality even with newer antimicrobial agents' introduction and supportive care improvement [1]. Numerous bacteria are involved in causing meningitis. Identifying meningitis-causing bacteria plays an important role in selecting the appropriate antibiotic and reducing the complications of meningitis [2]. Numerous studies have been performed in Iran and other countries to identify meningitis-causing bacteria [3-7]. Depending on age, geographic location, immune system function, and vaccine implementation, the incidence rates and causative organisms of bacterial meningitis can be different [2, 6]. Kerman city is located in the south of Iran, and so far, no comprehensive study has been conducted on identifying meningitis-causing bacteria in this city. Therefore, this study was performed to identify the causative agents of bacterial meningitis in Kerman city. Various serotypes of Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitides have been mentioned as the most important bacterial agents in the development of meningitis [2, 6]. So, in this study, Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitides serotypes were examined to select the appropriate vaccine.
Materials and Methods
This cross-sectional was conducted in the department of pediatrics at the Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Between February 2017 and June 2019. The ethical code of this study was IR.KMU.AH.REC. 1398.060. Sixty suspected cases of acute bacterial meningitis with signs included:  positive kerning sign, neck stiffness, upper and lower Brudzinski sign, and bulging fontanelle- hyperreflexia who were admitted to Afzalipour Hospital in Kerman city, were included in this study. A 3-5 ml of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens were immediately obtained and transported to the laboratory. In order to identify the type of bacteria in the CSF, conventional methods such as Gram staining, culture in differential media (Chocolate agar, Blood agar, McConkey agar, Tayer Martin) and the morphology of the colonies and standard biochemical tests including catalase, sugar utilization, oxidase, optochin test and bile solubility, Bacitracin test, triple sugar iron (TSI), indole-methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, citrate (IMVIC), sulfide-indole-motility (SIM(, and urea was used. Culture media and other chemicals were prepared from Merck Co. (Darmstadt, Germany). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to identify Neisseria Meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus influenzae, and their serotypes, as described by Attarpour-Yazdi et al. [5]. The positive control was Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619. In this study, eleven genes including: wzy, wzx, wzg, wcrH, wcwV, wciL, wciP, wcrG, wcwL, wciNbeta, and galU were studied.
Data analysis
The data were analyzed by SPSS version 23 software, using descriptive statistics and calculation of ratios and percentages.
Results and Discussion
Sixty patients (28 females and 32 males) suspected of meningitis were studied in this study. Twenty-one (35%) patients were neonates and 39 (65%) patients were aged one month to 70 years (Mean+SD = 18.5 ± 20.8 years). In the present study, conventional and molecular methods proved the presence of bacteria in 33.3% of the samples (Table 1). In the study of Yazdi et al. [5] in Tehran, 62.6% of CSF samples were positive for bacteria. In a study by Tegene et al. [2] in Ethiopia, 3.76% of CSF samples were positive for bacteria. In the Borjian study [7], which was conducted in the city of Borujan, 7.25% of CSF samples were positive for bacteria. In a study by Jayaraman et al. [4] in India, 27.27% of CSF samples were positive for bacteria. In another study in Hamadan, 7.9% of CSF samples were positive for bacteria [6]. Differences in the results of various studies can be attributed to differences in the geographical area, identification methods, and technician's skill in identifying bacteria. In the present study, smear preparation from CSF and gram staining showed bacterial meningitis in 60% of cases. In Tegene et al. [2], and Modi et al. [8] studies, gram staining showed the presence of bacteria in 82.8% and 64.3% of cases, respectively. The difference in the results of the studies can be attributed to the amount of bacteria in the CSF sample. However, due to the time-consuming nature of other methods, smear preparation and gram staining can help in the immediate diagnosis of bacterial meningitis in many cases. In our study, bacterial meningitis was approximately the same in males and females (11 males and 9 females).
Table 1. Absolute and relative abundance of microorganisms isolated from cerebrospinal fluid of meningitis patients
Percent Number Microorganism
65% 13 Streptococcus pneumoniae
10% 2 Staphylococcus epidermidis
10% 2 Klebsiella
5% 1 Enterococcus
5% 1 Escherichia coli
5% 1 Gram-positive cocci
100% 20 Total
This finding contradicts the results of a study by Attarpour-Yazdi et al. [5] in Tehran and Tegene et al. [2] in Ethiopia. The number of participants in the studies may be the cause of differences in the results. Streptococcus pneumonia, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Klebsiella, Enterococcus, Escherichia coli, and gram-positive cocci were the microbial agents identified in this study. These microorganisms were different from the results of studies conducted by Yazdi et al. [5] In Tehran, Modi et al. [8], in India, and Tegene et al. [2] in Ethiopia. The reason for the difference in the results of the studies can be related to the genetics and methods of detecting microbial agents. Streptococcus pneumonia was the most identified microorganism (65%). This finding was similar to the results of studies conducted by Yazdi et al. [5], Tegene et al. [2], and Modi et al. [8], who reported the prevalence of pneumococci as 36%, 31.6%, and 60%, respectively. Although Streptococcus pneumonia was predominant in all of these studies, differences in the frequency of the bacteria could be related to lifestyle, test method, and vaccination program. Today, more than 94 serotypes of pneumococci have been reported [2]. In the present study, 18CFBA
was the predominant (23.1%) serotype of Streptococcus pneumoniae 6ABCD (7.7%), 19a (7.7%), 16F (7.7%), and 1 (7.7%) were the other identified serotypes of the bacteria. These serotypes were different from the serotypes identified in the studies of Yazdi et al. [5] and Tegene et al. [2]. The reason for this difference can be related to the number of samples. 18CFBA was found in age groups: one month to 1 year, 10.1 to 30 years, and 30.1 to 70 years. 6ABCD, 1, 19a, and 16f were found in age groups: 1.1 to 10 years, one month to 1 year, 30.1 to 70 years one month to 1 year, respectively. In the present study, 46.2% of serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae were not identified, which could be related to the low level of bacteria in the samples. Contrary to the results of studies by Yazdi et al. [5] and Tegene et al. [2], Neisseria meningitides and Haemophilus influenzae were not found in the present study any of the samples. The reason for this difference can be related to the characteristics of the subjects and previous treatments. Studies have shown that Escherichia coli and enterococci can cause meningitis in newborns [9, 10]. In our research, these bacteria were isolated only from newborns.

Conclusion
In the present study, the detection rate of bacteria was low. This may be due to the problematic growth nature of some microbial agents, the low number of bacteria in the samples, or the use of antibiotics before sampling. Because the clinical signs of meningitis are not always reliable, laboratory methods are essential for early diagnosis. Simple, quick and inexpensive tests such as gram staining and adequate knowledge of the bacteriological epidemiology of meningitis can be a good guide for early treatment and reduction of complications. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common bacteria. Although many serotypes of this bacteria have not been identified, they can significantly help its vaccination program. Neisseria meningitides and Haemophilus
influenzae had no role in causing meningitis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the staff of Afzalipour Hospital and all those who contributed to this project.


References

[1].  Alhomsi K. Study of acute bacterial meningitis: demographics, symptoms and signs. Chem Res. 2020; 5(6): 21-4.
[2]. Tegene B, Denekew K, Mesele G. Phenotypic characterization and serotypes identification of CSF isolates in acute bacterial meningitis. Am J Infect Dis. 2017; 5(3): 100-105.
[3]. Kim JW, Chae SA, Kim SY, Lee NM, Yi DY, Yun SW, et al. Trends in pediatric meningitis in South Korea during 2009 to 2017: analysis of the health insurance review and assessment service database. Ann Child Neurol. 2020; 29(1): 30-6.
[4]. Jayaraman Y, Veeraraghavan B, Chethrapilly Purushothaman GK, Sukumar B, Kangusamy B, Nair Kapoor A,, et al. Burden of bacterial meningitis in India: Preliminary data from a hospital based sentinel surveillance network. PloS One 2018; 13(5): 197198.
[5]. Attarpour-Yazdi MM, Ghamarian A, Mousaviehzadeh M, Davoudi N. Identification of the serotypes of bacterial meningitis agents; implication for vaccine usage. Iran J Microbiol. 2014; 6(4): 211-18.
[6]. Yosefi-Mashouf R, Hashemi SH, Shams S. Study of bacterial agents of meningitis in children and detection of antibiogram patterns in Hamadan. YAFTE 2004; 5(2): 31-9.
[7]. Borjian S. The common agents of bacterial meningitis in children in Borujen. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 1999; 1(2): 52-8.
[8]. Modi S, Anand AK. Phenotypic characterization and antibiogram of CSF isolates in acute bacterial meningitis. JCDR 2013; 7(12): 2704-708.
[9]. Peros T, van Schuppen J, Bohte A, Hodiamont C, Aronica E, de Haan T. Neonatal bacterial meningitis versus ventriculitis: a cohort-based overview of clinical characteristics, microbiology and imaging. EurJ pediatr. 2020; 179(12): 1969-977.‏
[10]. Gahlot T, Kasana D. A cross-sectional study of etiological and sensitivity profiling of meningitis in under-five children. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2021; 10(2): 149-54.
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Bactriology
Received: 2021/06/27 | Accepted: 2021/08/14 | Published: 2022/03/17

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | International Journal of Medical Laboratory

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb